Jury to deliberate second day in Limestone County sheriff’s corruption trial

Alabama News
October 02 2021 06:00 pm

ATHENS, Ala. (AP/WIAT) — UPDATE: A jury will deliberate a second day in the corruption trial of a longtime Alabama sheriff accused of theft of campaign funds, using his office for person gain and taking money held by the sheriff’s office.

A judge told jurors who deliberated for about three hours Friday in the trial of Limestone County Sheriff Mike Blakley to return to court Monday morning for additional talks after they failed to reach a quick verdict.

Blakely, 70, took the stand to deny any wrongdoing. Still serving as sheriff while under indictment, he faces automatic removal from office if convicted of a felony.

Initially elected in 1982, Blakely told jurors he sometimes put campaign funds into his personal account because his campaign treasurer lived hours away and encouraged him to deposit the money as reimbursement for campaign expenses.

While testimony showed Blakely sometimes left IOUs and took money from a jail safe used to hold inmates’ money, he said that wasn’t a crime. He also said nothing illegal occurred when county prisoners worked at a business where a part owner gave him a check for $50,000.

Blakely didn’t deny gambling at casinos during trips to the Gulf Coast and Nevada for law enforcement conferences, but he said the outings didn’t cost taxpayers extra and denied accusations that an employee sent him money because he was broke from losses.

Blakely was indicted in 2019 but the case was delayed several times because of reason including the pandemic.

ORIGINAL: Jurors on Friday began deliberating charges against a longtime Alabama sheriff who took the stand to deny accusations that he took money from public and campaign accounts and gambled in casinos at taxpayer expense.

Prosecutors and defense lawyers finished closing arguments in the corruption case against Limestone County Sheriff Mike Blakely and jurors got the case around 2 p.m. News outlets reported the jurors were sent home for the weekend late Friday afternoon and will resume their deliberations Monday morning.

Blakely faces charges of using his office for personal gain, theft of campaign funds and taking money held by the sheriff’s office. He has continued working as sheriff since being indicted in 2019 on multiple charges but would automatically be removed from office with a felony conviction.

Prosecutors began their closing arguments to jurors by stepping through allegations that the sheriff took thousands of dollars illegally, news outlets reported.

“He swore an oath not just to enforce the law but to obey the law,” Kyle Beckman, a state assistant attorney general, told the jury. “He swore it 10 different times. Mike Blakely violated that oath.”

Defense lawyer Robert Tuten told jurors that there is a simple explanation for each of these charges, if they just look. Tuten said no money is missing and all of the accounts balance.

“The criminal case against Sheriff Blakely died in the courtroom floor,” Tuten said in his closing arguments.

Judge Pamela Baschab rejected a defense request to end the trial with a verdict of acquittal.

Blakely, 70, testified Thursday about a series of transactions and checks that prosecutors say are evidence of wrongdoing, and the defense contends show nothing but normal campaign finances, news outlets reported.

First elected in 1982 and rarely seen without boots and a cowboy hat, Blakely said he sometimes deposited campaign funds into his personal account because his campaign treasurer lived hours away and encouraged him to deposit the money as reimbursement for campaign expenses.

While testimony showed Blakely sometimes left IOUs and took money from a jail safe used to hold inmates’ money, he said that wasn’t a crime. He also said nothing illegal occurred when county prisoners worked at a business where a part owner gave him a check for $50,000.

Blakely didn’t deny gambling at casinos during trips to the Gulf Coast and Nevada for law enforcement conferences, but he said the outings didn’t cost taxpayers extra and denied accusations that an employee sent him money because he was broke from losses.

In one case, Blakely said, he asked an employee to send him money because he thought he might not have enough money to drive back to Alabama from Nevada.

“Did you run short of money because you gambled in a casino?” asked defense lawyer Robert Tuten.

“No sir,” Blakely replied.

Copyright 2021 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

TRENDING STORIES