The Pros and Cons of Charter Schools

Contributor: Phillip Ohnemus
Updated: 12/05/2011 4:59 pm

Related Stories:

Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large

Montgomery, Ala. (WIAT) - There's a fight brewing down in Montgomery and your child's education could be at stake.

President Obama has set aside billions of dollars for state education funding, but in order to qualify for that money, the state must offer charter schools to its residents.

For a school system that has lost close to 4,000 teaching jobs and one billion dollars in funding over the last two years, the money would be a big help.

But teacher's union boss Paul Hubbert says he will fight any proposal for charter schools in Alabama.

He calls them a fad, and says they actually take money away from public schools.

But Governor Riley says he would like the Alabama Legislature to pass a law enabling the creation of charter schools.

"There are places in Alabama that I think could really benefit from it but it really bothers me that we're going to say that there is a potential 200 million dollars that could come to the state but we can't even compete for it because we don't have it. That is a debate that is gonna go on for the next couple of weeks," said Riley.

So why does the teacher's union think that charters are a bad idea?

Paul Hubbert says that the money from the federal government is not guaranteed and if Alabama did get the schools, they would have to fund them, regardless of whether the state received the money.

But what exactly are charter schools?

Charter schools receive public funding and oversight, but are not subject to the same restrictions as traditional public schools. For example, charter schools have more freedom than public schools when it comes to hiring and firing teachers; they don't have to follow state-approved curriculum; and they are able to decide how long their school days and years will be.

Alabama is one of only 10 states in the country that does not offer charter schools.

But not everyone sees them as a positive addition to Alabama.

"We don't have enough money to educate kids in Alabama now and if we're putting money into schools that are not held to the same standards as public education, they're gonna become a country club where people send kids and the public schools are gonna be left with the kids that nobody else can educate or want to educate," said Vi Parramore, Jefferson County American Federation of Teachers President.

Parramore fears that the schools could wind up hurting the kids if the owners start operating them for profit.

"You'll see the schools lunches go downhill. You'll see the curriculum watered down. They start hiring people for half of what a regular teacher's paid, then they start going with alternative certifications where you have teachers who are not even qualified to be in the classroom teaching," explained Parramore.

Parramore believes that Alabama should keep the door open to the possible funding from Washington, but feels traditional charter schools are not the answer.

For more information, go to www.uscharterschools.org .


Share
2 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

MarkF - 12/11/2011 1:23 PM
0 Votes
Charter schools have more control of the classroom and the curriculum. Unruly students are easier to take corrective action against than in a regular public school and most of the students are more engaged in learning because they have a parent who is pushing them to learn. As for the 17% figure, I'm interested in knowing how the study was conducted. Numbers are easy to manipulate.

dorainseattle - 11/21/2009 9:08 PM
0 Votes
What Is a Charter School? The basic difference between a traditional public school and a privately run charter school is that with a charter school there is complete control of the school by a private enterprise within a public school district. Although taxpayer-funded, charters operate without the same degree of public and district oversight of a standard public school. Most charter schools do not hire union teachers which means that they can demand the teacher work longer hours including weekends at the school site and pay less than union wages. Charter schools take the school district's allotment of money provided for each student within the public schools system and use it to develop their programs. In many systems, they receive that allotment without having to pay for other costs such as transportation for students to and from the school. Some states, such as Minnesota, actually allocate more than what is granted to public school students. A charter school can expel any student that it doesn't believe fits within its standards or meets its level of expectation in terms of test scores. If the student is dropped off the rolls of the charter school, the money that was allotted for that student may or may not be returned to the district at the beginning of the next year. That is dependent upon the contract that is established by each district. Also, according to a recent (June 15, 2009) study by Stanford University's Center for Research on Education Outcomes (CREDO), charter schools do not necessarily perform any better than public schools. In fact, 37 percent performed worse. Forty-six percent demonstrated "no significant difference" from public schools. Only 17 percent of charter schools performed better than public schools. See: http://www.mn2020.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=%7B198C7021-C205-4F44-B914-84BDAF67A34B%7D http://docs.google.com/gview?a=v&q=cache%3








Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.



© 2012 New Vision Television | Site Map | Terms Of Use | Privacy Statement | Copyright & Trademark Notice | FCC Compliance