Explosive quotes from van der Sloot / Holloway movie maker

"The film pulls no punches in showing that Joran lied. That's why the main character, the investigative journalist, breaks the law to get at the truth. He, just like Joran, doesn't abide by the law."
Updated: 8/09/2010 5:44 pm
Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Birmingham, Al (WIAT) A Dutch article about a movie on the Holloway case has provoked bitter online commentary.

Things have been quiet on the Joran van der Sloot front lately.

There’s been next to no news out of Peru as the murder inquiry grinds through a legal system with no guarantee of a speedy trial.

Van der Sloot remains in the Castro Castro prison charged with murdering 21 year old student Stephany Flores in a case with spooky parallels to the disappearance of Mountain Brook teen Natalee Holloway on a graduation trip to Aruba.

Holloway, last seen with van der Sloot and the Kalpoe brothers, vanished five years to the day Flores’ body was found in van der Sloot’s Lima hotel room.

But while van der Sloot’s charges of legal misrepresentation and a coerced confession fade from the headlines, a firestorm of online commentary has broken out over a movie being produced by Dutch filmmaker Paul Ruven.

In another strange coincidence, Ruven was on Aruba making a fictionalized film about van der Sloot and the Holloway case when the news of Flores death broke.

After a several days flurry of stories about Ruven and his film “Me and Mr. Jones” things got quiet again until Myrtille van Bommel’s article quoting Ruven about his project. Although Ruven has been accused of being part of a whitewash on Aruban handling of the Natalee investigation, the picture painted in van Bommel’s article is very different.

In the article on the Radio Netherlands Worldwide site, Ruven appears to take on all parties in the case. Regarding van der Sloot, he’s quoted as saying “"The film pulls no punches in showing that Joran lied. That's why the main character, the investigative journalist, breaks the law to get at the truth. He, just like Joran, doesn't abide by the law."

But Natalee and the Holloway family are blasted as well. He says the image of her as some kind of holy virgin, an innocent girl, is just the way her mother wants her portrayed.

And although there have been allegations Ruven is part of a cover up/whitewash attempt to improve the image of tourist dependent Aruba, the island takes some hits in the article as well. Everybody on the island knows each other. When there are elections, the candidates are often sponsored by US hotel owners. The winning candidate appoints his entire family and distant friends to important governmental positions. These people hang on to the posts for the rest of their lives."
The article goes on to say that “It's this colonial background of favourism and conflict of interests that allows a young rich Dutchman to do what he likes without being brought to justice. Mr Ruven believes nobody on Aruba wants the truth to come out. It was also never the intention that Joran should end up in prison. That would damage tourism and the economy.”
Sounds like he’s out to offend all involved…..but that’s nothing compared to the online comments van Bommel’s article has spawned.

Here’s a quick sample…and remember, anyone with a keyboard can say pretty much anything on line so supply your own perspective and skepticism:

Miranda and Jeff from Amsterdam weigh in with a lengthy denunciation of the entire Holloway family linking extensively to a documentary Natalee Holloway ''The Unrevealed Timelines'' and ending with this plea: “We believe in karma Mr. Ruven , so please go ahead and give us the real Natalee Holloway and not the BS her mother tried to feed us, it will benefit you and your movie. Thank you for reading this email."
Whereupon the firefight ensues. Marie chimes in with “I see the Van der Sloots have marshaled their family members to join in on the discussion!” Only to be gently rebuked by Bippity for giving Miranda and Jeff to much credit.

Bippity goes on to say “Mr. Ruven believed the lies about Natalee -- that's his bad. He should have demanded proof or at least questioned how something like that could be covered up for five years. But despite having ridiculous "sources" of info, shown by his false portrayal of Natalee, he still concluded Joran is guilty and Aruban authorities covered it up; just as they always had; because he was rich, white and Dutch.”

There’s lots more on the RNW website.


Share
4 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

In the ditch - 8/12/2010 2:34 AM
0 Votes
I noticed CBS42 included my comment in a follow up story. Since I paraphrased the post from RNW, I will list the complete source I referenced from their article. (Before you ask - Yes, RNW allows anonymous posts, and No this isn't me.) **************** Anonymous 3 August 2010 - 7:34am * reply The awarding winning Mr. Ruven was also the director of Renee Gielen's documentary bashing Natalee and her family. Dolph van Stapele is the camera man on the award winning Mr. Ruven's new endeavour, Me and Mr. Jones. Dolph van Stapele is Renee Gielen's son. Renee Gielen is Anita Van der Sloot's cousin. Enough said! **************** Obviously many unsupported claims were probably made throughout the posts in the article. However, since credibility may be a key factor regarding the success of his film, I hope Mr. Ruven chooses to address this issue. Regarding blaming the victim for her part in her death / disappearance ... I am sure this will be a weak selling point for many and in fact will keep me from seeing the film.

Rose7 - 8/11/2010 8:12 PM
0 Votes
You can't be sincerely searching for the truth when you use unconfirmed lies about a victim, her family, the MB kids, and their community. Just how many times did this Ruven say he had been to Montain Brook? How many and which kids did he interview? Well Renfro and Dompig are hardly 'sources' - they ARE part of the cover-up! Kinda sounds like a conflict of interest. So, Ruven just may not be un-biased after all. Or, at least, he's not qualified to give anyone a "truthful" account of anything!!

epminks - 8/9/2010 3:29 PM
0 Votes
It doesn't matter to me what people have to say about Natalie. We all sin and fall short of the glory of God. Regardless of what she did and how she did it, she did not deserve to be robbed of life or anything else.

In the ditch - 8/7/2010 12:48 PM
0 Votes
The title of the original RNW article implies Ruven's film "searches for the truth" about Natalee Holloway's disappearance. What is not immediately obvious in the article is that Ruven was involved in another "trash and bash documentary" about Natalee Holloway produced by Renee Gielen. As taken from the posts: I think it goes like this..... Paul Ruven, the director of the new movie, was also the director of Renee Gielen's documentary. Dolph van Stapele, the director of photography and cinematographer, is Renee Gielen's son. Renee Gielen is Anita Van der Sloot's cousin. etc, etc, etc. So much for objectivity. Unfortunately (for Ruven), Joran went to Peru in the middle of the filming and put a serious kink in their story line. I know that people eat up sensationalistic films, but my gut feeling is to boycott this film.








Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.



© 2012 New Vision Television | Site Map | Terms Of Use | Privacy Statement | Copyright & Trademark Notice | FCC Compliance